Tuesday, December 2, 2014

At ye water side next Merrimack river over against Newbury landing place from Mr Goodings bound tree to a white oak stump about nine or ten rods and so runeing up ye hill on ye lower side to a walnut tree marked with A over a small white oak marked with an A about four rods wide ranging up ye hill between two small black oaks marked about four rods apart and so upward to a great rock on ye lower side in baileys hill two rods wide and so e town ward two rod wide through ye land of ye sd Bayley being one hundred and ten rods and one half in length so through ye land of john weeds between two great rocks about fifty three rods and half in length two rod wide and so to ye land of Goodman Haddens next ye street as witness our hands the 17th 1670. This is the plotting of a “highway” back in 1670 which is similar to the present day 95, running by then same landmarks as the new road. This part of the book stood out to me because it seemed very unlikely that anyone would be able to follow these directions. I do understand that that is how people used to talk but the fact that they were using trees and rocks as points to follow just seemed interesting to me. Whenever my father is starting up a new development he and I always go over the road plan just because I’ve always been interested in how it affects the overall look of the subdivision. Legally he and the other developers have to create a written statement similar to this on where it will run and where all of the lots will be. Instead of landmarks, they use specific GPS coordinates because it is easier for them to write those down simply because they script will in fact never be read and they already have that information in front of them. Instead of looking at the script, there large blueprints of the desired path all with specific measurements put together by the zoners.

4 comments:

  1. John-Luc,
    This is a little confusing not just because of the language but because you didn't put any quotation marks in it or cite the page, or even the book, that you got it from. Could you please go back and revise that? Also, after you start discussing the quote, please break your entry up into two paragraphs, one where you explain the context of the quote (you started to but didn't finish), and then start a new paragraph when you go into more depth about your personal connection (which was a really cool one for this quote!).

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was perplexed. You didn't put any quotations in it. After I got it though, I was very entertained by your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This was a very interesting blog John-Luc. Your background of the wood makes it even harder to read and without any quotations I was a bit challenging to decipher who said what, but all in all it was a very entertaining blog and keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This was an interesting post. It must be neat to read about the past of areas we live in. Its a little hard to follow because there are no quotations or any sort of separation from the quote and your writing. It also was a little short, and could maybe use more connections to how things are now compared to in the past.

    ReplyDelete